Peer Review for Sam Teacher Example
5 pointsGrade
- Technically perfect
- Follows the classical argument
- Displays an interesting and unique perspective on a highly specialized topic
- Thought provoking and captivating
- Clearly the product of extensive drafting and research
4 points
- Technically perfect
- Follows the classical argument
- Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic
3 points
- Clearly the product of thorough drafting and research
- Follows the classical argument
- Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic
- Some evidence of drafting and research
2 points0 points
- Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic
- Incomplete or inadequate
According to the rubric above, what grade would you give this essay? Why?
4점. 자료도 충분하고 Thesis 도 잘 드러남.
How does this essay need to improve to get a better grade?
Enough.
Thesis
What is the thesis?
Civic Participation in Criminal Trials should exist.
Is the thesis clear and debatable?
Yes. 왜 그런 생각을 가졌는지?
If you (The reviewer) wrote this essay, how would you have written the thesis?
왜, 무엇을 위해 필요한지 구체적으로. 하지만 잘 썼음.
Any other thoughts?
Interesting 한 주제. 왜 필요한지 궁금해짐.
Classical Argument
Can you easily identify the 5 parts of the classical argument? If no, what parts are missing?
Yes.
Does the introduction catch your attention? Does it comfortably lead to the thesis?
Yes. it did. 재판의 종류를 설명하고 시민 재판이 무엇인지 밝힘.
Does the narration give all the necessary background information to understand the topic?
Not all. but I understood what she wanted to write.
Does the confirmation adequately support the thesis?
Yes.
Does the refutation and concession address a realistic counterpoint? Does it adequately dispute the counterpoint, or respond in a reasonable manner?
Yes.
Does the conclusion summarize the article and address the larger significance of the thesis?
Yes, it did.
What suggestions do you have for improving the classical argument structure?
잘 썼음.
Persuasion
When you started reading the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
I agreed with the thesis.
When you finished the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
I still agree with the thesis.
If your mind changed, why? What parts of the essay were persuasive?
I did not change my mind.
How could the author enhance the persuasive parts of their essay?
주장을 뒷받침 할 수 있는 자료가 많음.
Persuasion
When you started reading the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
I agreed with the thesis.
When you finished the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
I still agree with the thesis.
If your mind changed, why? What parts of the essay were persuasive?
I did not change my mind.
How could the author enhance the persuasive parts of their essay?
주장을 뒷받침 할 수 있는 자료가 많음.
Research
Is the author using research effectively?
Yes
Is the research from appropriate sources?
Yes.
Are the sources obvious?
Yes.
Are the pieces of evidence relevant to the thesis or essay?
Yes.
Are there any parts of the essay that need evidence to support the claims?
No. 많은 자료를 사용하여 주장을 뒷받침하고 있기 때문에 이미 충분하다.